The 10% Accent Rule: Composites That Beat Their Ingredients
**Category:** checkpoint | **Tier:** Insider ($5) | **Estimated reading time:** 7 min
**Excerpt:** You ran a graft-comparison round at 3...
Related Tutorials
Reading Blind Eval Results
How to read a blind eval scoreboard without lying to yourself: placement frequency, head-to-head vs aggregate scoring, and why a 6-4 win in 10 prompts is closer to a coin flip than a verdict.
How to Run a Checkpoint Comparison Sweep
Blind eval methodology for crowning (or dethroning) a checkpoint: prompt pool, blind HTML, scoring schemes, and how to know when one round of testing is enough.
Why Baked LoRAs Behave Differently Than Runtime LoRAs
You tested a LoRA stack at runtime — included it in the prompt at specific weights — and the output was great. You baked the same stack into the model at the same weights, expecting the same output. Instead you got neon nightmare, blown-out colors, or just a noticeably weaker version of what worked at runtime. Same weights, same LoRAs, same base model. Why does the bake behave differently? Three reasons that compound: CFG amplification math, fp16 precision drift, and sequential layering effects. Understanding each tells you why some recipes will never bake, no matter how much you tune.